Gilkey v. State

Knudson, J.:

William A. Gilkey appeals from the trial court’s summary denial of his motion filed under K.S.A. 60-1507. On appeal, Gilkey contends the trial court did not enter findings of fact and conclusions of law as required by Supreme Court Rule 183(j) (2001 Kan. Ct. R. Annot. 210). Alternatively, Gilkey contends the trial court erred in summarily dismissing his motion without an evidentiaiy hearing.

We affirm the trial court. The court’s findings and conclusions are sufficient for meaningful appellate review. The court did not err in concluding Gilkey’s motion presented no issues of fact…