Legal Opinion
Click-to-Call Technologies v. Ingenio, Inc.
District Court, W.D. Texas
Decided February 26, 2025No. 1:12-cv-00465Unknown
1Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS AUSTIN DIVISION CLICK-TO-CALL § No. 1 :12-cv-00465-DAE TECHNOLOGIES LP, § Plaintiff, § § v. § § INGENIO, INC., et al., § Defendants. § ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION Before the Court is a Report and Recommendation (“Recommendation”) filed by United States Magistrate Judge Susan Hightower. (Dkt. # 306.) On June 14, 2024, Defendants Ingenio, Inc., Ether, and Thryv, Inc. (collectively “Defendants” or “Thryv”) filed a Motion for Summary Judgment of Invalidity Based on Collateral Estoppel. (Dkt. # 294.) On the same day, Plaintiff…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Thomas v. ArnSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- United States of America and Robert W. Wallace v. Claude R. Wilson, Jr., and Modes, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1989
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.