Legal Opinion
Shapiro v. Alexanderson
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided July 9, 1990No. 87 Civ. 8099 (RPP)PublishedCited by 17 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
ROBERT P. PATTERSON, Jr., District Judge.
Plaintiff Saul Shapiro (“Shapiro”) moves and defendants Peter C. Alexanderson and the County of Putnam (“the County”) cross-move for summary judgment, pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 56. Defendant Emil Landau (“Landau”) moves to amend his answer, pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 15.
Background
In December 1968, Shapiro and Landau purchased, as tenants in common, an undeveloped 100 acre parcel of land in Putnam County on Old Route 6, Carmel, New York. On March 25, 1975, the County executed a contract to purchase…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Marrese v. American Academy of Orthopaedic SurgeonsSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Ryan v. New York Telephone Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1984
- The State of New York v. Shore Realty Corp. And Donald LeograndeCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1985
- Cullen v. MargiottaCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1987
- Mardan Corporation v. C.G.C. Music, Ltd. And MacMillan Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1986
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- General Electric Company v. Litton Industrial Automation Systems, Inc. And Litton Industries, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1990
- Carson Harbor Village, Ltd. v. Unocal Corp.District Court, C.D. California · 2003
- Pease & Curren Refining, Inc. v. Spectrolab, Inc.District Court, C.D. California · 1990
- Donahey v. BogleCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1993
- Juniper Development Group v. Kahn (In Re Hemingway Transport, Inc.)District Court, D. Massachusetts · 1991
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.