District of Columbia Department of Consumer & Regulatory Affairs v. Stanford
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
NEBEKER, Senior Judge:
The District of Columbia’s Department of Consumer and Regulatory Affairs seeks our review of the decision by the Office of Administrative Hearings removing a lien against real property and voiding past housing code violations. Because the decision was made without jurisdiction over the subject matter and was in violation of the District of Columbia’s Anti-Injunction Act, we reverse.
FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL SUMMARY
Amos and Juanita Stanford owned, as tenants by the entirety, a multi-unit apartment building located at 2384 Champlain Street, in Northwest Washington, D.C. Amos…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Bull v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
- District of Columbia v. GreenDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1973
- Washington v. District of Columbia Department of Public WorksDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2008
- Barry v. American Telephone & Telegraph Co.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1989
- District of Columbia v. CraigDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2007
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- District of Columbia Department of the Environment v. East Capitol ExxonDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2013
- NELDA PERKINS v. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIADistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2016
- Beatley v. District of ColumbiaDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2024
- Beatley v. District of ColumbiaDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2024