Legal Opinion

Harvey Hubbell, Inc. v. Fitzgerald Mfg. Co.

District Court, D. Connecticut

Decided September 13, 1922No. 1559PublishedCited by 3 opinions

In Equity. Suit by Harvey Hubbell, Inc., against the Fitzgerald Manufacturing Company.

1Opinion of the Court

THOMAS, District Judge.

This is the usual patent suit, charging the defendant with infringement of letters patent No. 1,064,833, granted to Harvey Hubbell on June 17, 1913. The subject-matter relates to what is known as separable attachment plugs for use in making electri*791cal connections. One part of the plug screws into the wall socket, floor socket, lamp socket, or the like, and the other part is readily separable therefrom fly the strain necessary to pull apart the pairs of spring contacts respectively carried by the base part of the plug and the cap part ; the latter carrying the ends of…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Atlantic Works v. BradySupreme Court of the United States · 1883
  2. Hollister v. Benedict & Burnham Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1885
  3. Corbin Cabinet Lock Co. v. Eagle Lock Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1893
  4. Harvey Hubbell, Inc. v. General Electric Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1920
  5. Johnson v. Lit Bros., Inc.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1921

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Carson v. American Smelting & Refining Co.District Court, W.D. Washington · 1923
  2. Bourke v. BuegeleisenDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1926
  3. Martin v. SplainCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1917

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API