Legal Opinion
B-B
Board of Immigration Appeals
Decided July 1, 1998No. ID 3367PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Interim Decision #3367 In re B-B- et al., Respondents Decided September 24, 1998 U.S. Department of Justice Executive Office for Immigration Review Board of Immigration Appeals Where counsel’s insistence on corroborating evidence discouraged the respondents from seeking asylum, but was reasonable in light of case precedent, there is no showing of ineffective assistance of counsel. Paul Shearman Allen, Esquire, Washington, D.C., for the respondents J. Dan Pelletier, Sr., General Attorney, for the Immigration and Naturalization Service Before: Board Panel: SCHMIDT, Chairman; HURWITZ and…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- LOZADABoard of Immigration Appeals · 1988
- Immigration & Naturalization Service v. DohertySupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- MOGARRABIBoard of Immigration Appeals · 1987
- S-M-JBoard of Immigration Appeals · 1997
- Arie SHAAR; Helina Shaar; Shay Moshe Shaar, Petitioners, v. IMMIGRATION AND NATURALIZATION SERVICE, RespondentCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1998
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Miguel Angel Iturribarria v. Immigration and Naturalization ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
- Massis v. MukaseyCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2008
- D-RBoard of Immigration Appeals · 2011
- Shan Sheng Zhao v. HolderCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2009
- Manuel Guzman-Vazquez v. William P. BarrCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2020
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.