Legal Opinion

People v. Urena

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided April 10, 2007Published

1Opinion of the Court

Application by the *675appellant for a writ of error coram nobis to vacate, on the ground of ineffective assistance of appellate counsel, a decision and order of this Court dated May 5, 2003 (People v Urena, 305 AD2d 433 [2003]), affirming a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County, rendered April 10, 2001.

Ordered that the application is denied.

The appellant has failed to establish that he was denied the effective assistance of appellate counsel (see Jones v Barnes, 463 US 745 [1983]; People v Stultz, 2 NY3d 277 [2004]). Prudenti, P.J., Miller, Mastro and Florio, JJ., concur.

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Jones v. BarnesSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  2. People v. StultzNew York Court of Appeals · 2004
  3. People v. UrenaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2003