Legal Opinion
Tucker v. Special Energy Corp.
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided June 17, 2008No. 104,464PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtColbert, J.
1 1 Plaintiffs have appealed from an order of the district court dismissing their lawsuit to quiet title to a mineral interest and seeking an accounting of funds placed in escrow for their predecessor-in-title. The district court concluded that the lawsuit was an impermissible collateral attack on an order of the Oklahoma Corporation Commission. The Court of Civil Appeals affirmed. On certio-rari, we conclude that Plaintiffs' claim is not an impermissible collateral attack on a Commission order, as the remedy they seek is not within the Commission's jurisdiction.
BACKGROUND
12 William Howard…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Frazier v. Bryan Memorial Hospital AuthoritySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1989
- Brown v. Alliance Real Estate GroupSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1999
- Tenneco Oil Co. v. El Paso Natural Gas Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1984
- Fent v. Oklahoma Nat. Gas, a Div. of OneokSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1994
- Samson Resources Co. v. Corporation CommissionSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1985
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Tuffy's, Inc. v. City of Oklahoma CitySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2009
- Schovanec v. Archdiocese of Oklahoma CitySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2008
- Samson Resources Co. v. Newfield Exploration Mid-Continent, Inc.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 2012
- Grayhorse Energy, LLC v. Crawley Petroleum Corp.Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 2010
- Morgan v. Oklahoma Corp. CommissionCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 2011
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.