Legal Opinion

Etheridge v. Yeager

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided February 8, 1985No. 83-788PublishedCited by 27 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Following an ore tenus hearing, the Circuit Court of Bibb County entered a judgment holding that Louise Etheridge was not the common law wife of Joe Yeager, and setting aside letters of administration theretofore granted to her by the Probate Court of Bibb County. Etheridge appealed from that judgment. We affirm.

Ms. Etheridge, claiming to be the widow, petitioned the Bibb County Probate Court for letters of administration on the estate of Joe Yeager. That court granted the letters. Shortly thereafter, however, the brother and sisters of Joe Yeager filed a contest of her letters and petitioned…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Sloss-Sheffield Steel & Iron Co. v. WatfordSupreme Court of Alabama · 1944
  2. Piel v. BrownSupreme Court of Alabama · 1978
  3. Beck v. BeckSupreme Court of Alabama · 1971
  4. Turner v. TurnerSupreme Court of Alabama · 1948
  5. Forest Investment Corp. v. Commercial Credit Corp.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1960

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by27 opinions

  1. Mattison v. KirkSupreme Court of Alabama · 1986
  2. Boswell v. BoswellSupreme Court of Alabama · 1986
  3. Sokol v. Bruno's, Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1988
  4. Baker v. TownsendCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1986
  5. Ex Parte BrownSupreme Court of Alabama · 1990

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API