(PC) Hankins v. Sacramento County
District Court, E.D. California
1Opinion
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 8 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 10 JEREMIAH HANKINS, No. 2:24-cv-0150 TLN SCR P 11 Plaintiff, 12 v. ORDER 13 SACRAMENTO COUNTY, et al., 14 Defendants. 15 16 Plaintiff is a civil detainee proceeding pro se with a civil rights action under
42 U.S.C. § 17
1983. Plaintiff’s second amended complaint (“SAC”) is before the court for screening.1 (ECF 18 No. 22.) For the reasons set forth below, the undersigned finds that the SAC states cognizable 19 Fourteenth Amendment inadequate medical care claims against defendants Williams, Sokolov, 20 Malasan,…
2Cases cited36 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Monell v. New York City Dept. of Social Servs.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Erickson v. PardusSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Neitzke v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.