Legal Opinion

Hill v. Standard Telephone Manufacturing Co.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided February 25, 1901No. Appeal, No. 254PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Appeal, No. 254, Jan. T., 1900, by defendants, from decree of C. P. No. 4, Phila. Co., Dec. T., 1897, No. 522, on bill in equity in case of Myron F. Hill v. The Standard Telephone Manufacturing Company and George F. Payne and Charles G. Wetter, copartners, trading as George F. Payne & Company. Bill in equity to have a trust declared as to the assets of a corporation in the hands of directors.

Read the full summary

Appeal, No. 254, Jan. T., 1900, by defendants, from decree of C. P. No. 4, Phila. Co., Dec. T., 1897, No. 522, on bill in equity in case of Myron F. Hill v. The Standard Telephone Manufacturing Company and George F. Payne and Charles G. Wetter, copartners, trading as George F. Payne & Company. Bill in equity to have a trust declared as to the assets of a corporation in the hands of directors. Before Audenbied, J. ■ From the record it appeared that on May 23, 1899, Myron F. Hill, the plaintiff, recovered a judgment against the Standard Telephone Manufacturing Company for $652.52, on a suit…

1Opinion of the Court

Peb Cum am,

We are not convinced of error in the conclusions arrived at by the court below. It follows that the decree based on the conclusions must be affirmed and the specifications of error dismissed.

Decree affirmed and appeal dismissed at the cost of the appellants.

2Cited by4 opinions

  1. In Re Total Containment, Inc.United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2005
  2. Miller v. Parker (In Re Reading Broadcasting, Inc.)United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2008
  3. Robar Development Corp. v. MinutelloSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1979
  4. Taylor v. Penrose Motor Co., Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Philadelphia County1929

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API