Legal Opinion

Taylor v. Penrose Motor Co.

Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Philadelphia County

Decided July 8, 1929No. 9012Published

1Opinion of the Court

Alessandroni, J.,

The plaintiff brings a bill of complaint to compel the defendants to file an accounting of the assets and liabilities of the Penrose Motor Company prior to Nov. 1, 19-25, and demanding that the plaintiff’s claim as a creditor be set forth in the accounting. It is demanded that the defendant, Esslinger, be commanded to pay the plaintiff such sum as shall appear owing to her by the accounting. Upon consideration of the bill, answer to the bill, answers to interrogatories taken before a commissioner and the testimony produced on the hearing, the court makes the following

Findings…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Cowan v. Pennsylvania Plate Glass Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1898
  2. Pocono Spring Water Ice Co. v. American Ice Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1906
  3. Sicardi v. Keystone Oil Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1892
  4. Mueller v. Monongahela Fire Clay Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1898
  5. Pangburn v. American Vault, Safe & Lock Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1903

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API