Legal Opinion
Capacchione v. Charlotte-Mecklenburg Board of Education
District Court, W.D. North Carolina
Decided May 20, 1998No. 3:97CV482-P; No. Civ.A.1974PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OF DECISION AND ORDER
ROBERT D. POTTER, Senior District Judge.
THIS MATTER is before the Court on the Motion to Intervene by Michael P. Grant, Richard Easterling, Lawrence Gauvreau, Karen Bentley, Charles Thompson, and Scott C. Willard (together “Proposed Intervenors”) 1 filed on 8 April 1998 [document no. 39]. Because the application was timely filed, there are common questions of law and fact in their claims and the claims in the consolidated actions, and Proposed Intervenors’ intervention will not unduly delay or prejudice the adjudication of the original parties’ rights, the…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- William E. Nuesse, Commissioner of Banks, State of Wisconsin v. William Camp, Comptroller of the CurrencyCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1967
- Feller v. BrockCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1986
- United States v. Perry County Board of Education, Joann Parsons, Movants-AppellantsCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1978
- Herbert Pate v. Dade County School Board, Etc. v. Ethel Beckford, Movants-AppellantsCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1979
- Hill v. Western Electric Co.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1982
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Bussian v. DaimlerChrysler Corp.District Court, M.D. North Carolina · 2006
- Students for Fair Admissions Inc. v. University of North CarolinaDistrict Court, M.D. North Carolina · 2017
- Carcaño v. McCroryDistrict Court, M.D. North Carolina · 2016
- Hunter v. Town of MocksvilleDistrict Court, M.D. North Carolina · 2017