Legal Opinion
Moreno v. United States
United States Court of Federal Claims
Decided July 27, 2009No. 05-142CPublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
*268OPINION
FIRESTONE, Judge.
The plaintiffs, current and former employees of the United States Department of Homeland Security (“DHS”) and one former employee of the United States Immigration and Naturalization Service (“INS”)1 (Arturo Moreno (“Mr.Moreno”), the named plaintiff in the case), brought this suit under the Fair Labor Standards Act (“FLSA”), 29 U.S.C. §§ 201-219 (2000), to recover unpaid overtime wages,2 liquidated damages, costs and attorneys’ fees. The plaintiffs allege that they are entitled to liquidated damages as a result of the failure of the defendant, the United States…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- Irwin v. Department of Veterans AffairsSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- American Pipe & Construction Co. v. UtahSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Baldwin County Welcome Center v. BrownSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- McLaughlin v. Richland Shoe Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Brooklyn Savings Bank v. O'NeilSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Abbey v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2012
- Stevens v. HolderDistrict Court, E.D. Virginia · 2013
- Figueroa v. District of Columbia Metropolitan Police DepartmentDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2013
- Kwoka v. Enterprise Rent-A-Car Company of Boston, LLCCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2025
- Acala v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2022
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.