Frye Construction, Inc. v. City of Monongahela
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
PAPADAKOS, Justice.
While it is not unusual for our Court to confront a case of chickens coming home to roost, here it is pigeons- returning to the nest instead that has caused the difficulty. The facts are as follows:
According to Appellant’s Amended Complaint, Appellees, John A. and R. Carole Zentek, submitted an application for a building permit to the City of Monongahela and its City Engineer. The application sought permission to build a “lawn building — storage accessory use to a residence.” The application was approved and a building permit issued in May, 1980. There…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Feingold v. Bell of PennsylvaniaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1977
- Elkin v. Bell Tel. Co. of PennsylvaniaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1980
- Commonwealth, Department of Public Welfare v. EisenbergSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1982
- City of Philadelphia v. Stradford Arms, Inc.Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1971
- In Re LeopardiSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Pennsylvania Ass'n of Rehabilitation Facilities v. FosterCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1992
- Koresko v. FarleyCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2004
- Peden v. Gambone Bros. Development Co.Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2002
- MacHipongo Land & Coal Co. v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1994
- Ostrov v. I.F.T., Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1991
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.