California State Board of Equalization v. Renovizor's Inc. (In re Renovizor's Inc.)
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
GOULD, Circuit Judge.
Debtor, Renovizor’s, in bankruptcy court, objected to a claim filed by the California State Board of Equalization (“SBE”). In the trial held in bankruptcy court, SBE’s claim for civil tax fraud was upheld. On appeal, the United States District Court for the Northern District of California affirmed the bankruptcy court. Renovizor’s now appeals to our Court. The primary issue that we must decide is whether under California law civil tax fraud must be proved by clear and convincing evidence, as appellant Renovizor’s contends, or instead by a preponderance of the evidence,…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Santosky v. KramerSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Grogan v. GarnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Cynthia D. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1993
- Liodas v. SahadiCalifornia Supreme Court · 1977
- Weiner v. FleischmanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1991
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Benezet Consulting, LLC v. CortesDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 2020
- Benezet Consulting, LLC v. CortesDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 2020
- In Re Renovizor's, Inc., Debtor. California State Board of Equalization v. Renovizor's Inc., AKA the Hang-Ups AKA the Rose Collection, Debtor-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2002