Legal Opinion

Cambridge Mutual Fire Insurance Co. v. Newton

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided June 9, 1982No. 21021PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*78ALLEN, Justice.

This is a suit on a Texas standard homeowners broadform insurance policy. Bob and Pamela Newton (Newtons) and Fort Worth Mortgage Corporation (mortgagee) brought this action against Cambridge Mutual Fire Insurance Company (Cambridge Mutual) seeking to recover damages sustained as the result of a fire that destroyed the Newton home. Following a trial to a jury on special issues, the Newtons were awarded $19,104.00 under the terms of the policy. A take-nothing judgment was rendered on the mortgagee’s claim against Cambridge Mutual. On appeal, Cambridge Mutual contends that (1)…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Freedom Homes of Texas, Inc. v. DickinsonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1980
  2. Kirk v. Standard Life and Accident Insurance Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1972
  3. Campagna v. Underwriters at Lloyd's LondonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1977
  4. C. M. Fisher v. Indiana Lumbermens Mutual Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1972
  5. Bryan v. United States Fire Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1970

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Dallas Market Center Development Co. v. LiedekerTexas Supreme Court · 1997
  2. Cigna Insurance v. BrissonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1988
  3. Miller v. DickensonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1984
  4. Moffett v. Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1983
  5. City of Terrell v. McFarland, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)1988

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API