Legal Opinion
Mitchell v. MG INDUSTRIES, INC.
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Decided September 30, 2011No. Civil Action 05-4073PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM
JUAN R. SÁNCHEZ, District Judge.
Plaintiffs Edgar Mitchell, John Muller and Joseph Cherneski bring employment discrimination claims against Messer Griesheim Industries, Inc./ALIG LLC (MG), and its three successors in interest, L’Air Liquide S.A., Air Liquide Industrial U.S. LP, and Air Liquide Large Industries U.S. LP, pursuant to the Age Discrimination in Employment Act (ADEA), 29 U.S.C. § 626 et seq. and the Pennsylvania Human Relations Act (PHRA), 43 P.S. § 961 et seq. Plaintiffs allege MG discriminated against them on the basis of age by not inviting them to participate in a…
2Cases cited38 opinions
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Hishon v. King & SpaldingSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Price Waterhouse v. HopkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Kach v. Hose ex rel. St. Moritz Security Services, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2009
33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Romero v. Allstate InsuranceDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2014
- Ali v. McCarthyDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2016
- Penelope Bell v. City of Clairton, Duane Ringgold, and Eric FuscoDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 2026
- Samuels v. TARGET REALTY, LLCDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2021