Legal Opinion

Ali v. McCarthy

District Court, District of Columbia

Decided April 12, 2016No. Civil Action No. 2014-1674PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION

TANYA S. CHUTEAN, United States District Judge

Plaintiff Ghulam Ali alleges that the Environmental Protection Agency (the “Agency”) discriminated against him due to his race, gender, national origin, age and disability. He also alleges that the Agency retaliated against him. Specifically, Ali claims that the Agency acted with dis-criminatoiy and/or retaliatory motive when it: (1) failed to promote him to pay grade GS-14; (2) transferred him throughout the Agency; and (3) refused to allow him to continue working in a private office as an accommodation for his environmental…

2Cases cited38 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  5. Haines v. KernerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972

33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Ghulam Ali v. Michael ReganCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2024
  2. Ali v. PruittDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2020
  3. Ali v. ZeldinDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2026
  4. Flynn v. Crossville Housing Authority (TV1)District Court, M.D. Tennessee · 2022
  5. Kirkland v. DukeDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2019

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API