Legal Opinion

Kukich v. Serbian Eastern Orthodox Church

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided July 1, 1964No. Appeal, No. 110PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mr. Justice Eagen,

In this action in equity, the chancellor entered a compulsory nonsuit. No motion to remove or set aside the judgment was entered below, but instead an appeal was filed directly to this Court. The appeal was prematurely taken and must be quashed.

An appeal does not lie from the entry of a judgment of nonsuit but rather from the refusal to take it off: *29Nazareth F. & M. Co. v. Marshall, 257 Pa. 489, 101 A. 848 (1917); McDonald v. Babcock, 269 Pa. 68, 112 A. 29 (1920). This applies to actions at law as well as in equity. See, Pa. R. C. P. Rule 1512. Under the Act of…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Dellacasse v. Floyd Exrs.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1938
  2. Jordan v. Sun Life Assurance Co. of CanadaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1951
  3. Haverly v. MercurSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1875
  4. Bausbach v. ReiffSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1912
  5. Nazareth Foundry & Machine Co. v. MarshallSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1917

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Miller v. HurstSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1982
  2. F. W. Wise Co. v. Beech Creek RailroadSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1970
  3. Sharp v. LuksaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1970
  4. Kiely Ex Rel. Feinstein v. Phila. Contributionship Ins. Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2019
  5. Jervis WillSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1971

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API