Legal Opinion

Duignan v. Montana Club

Montana Supreme Court

Decided May 13, 1895PublishedCited by 8 opinions

Appeal from First Judicial District, Lewis and Glarhe County. Action to foreclose mechanics’ lien. Judgment was rendered for plaintiffs below by Buck,

1Opinion of the CourtDeWitt, J.

This action was brought to obtain a judgment for materials furnished one of the defendants, and to foreclose a lien against the clubhouse of the defendant, the Montana Club. There was a judgment for the plaintiffs. The defendant, *190the Montana Club, appeals. The appeal is here upon the judgment roll only.

The Montana Club contracted with D. P. Wortman to erect the building. Wortman contracted with William Harrison, and William Harrison with the Helena Co-operative Granite & Sandstone Company, which company contracted with the plaintiffs for supplying certain stone. The plaintiffs are therefore…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Cole Manufacturing Co. v. FallsTennessee Supreme Court · 1891
  2. Merrigan v. EnglishMontana Supreme Court · 1889
  3. Hershfield & Bro. v. AikenMontana Supreme Court · 1880
  4. Wood v. DonaldsonNew York Supreme Court · 1837
  5. Murphy v. PhelpsMontana Supreme Court · 1892

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Christiansen v. AldrichMontana Supreme Court · 1904
  2. Becker v. HopperWyoming Supreme Court · 1914
  3. Pere Marquette Railroad v. BaertzIndiana Court of Appeals · 1905
  4. Aldritt v. PantonMontana Supreme Court · 1895
  5. Lane v. Lane Potter Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1910

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API