Aldritt v. Panton

This action was brought by the plaintiffs to obtain a judgment against defendant Noe for lumber furnished to him, as a contractor, for use in a house which he’was erect-’ ing for defendants Maud and Samuel Panton, and for foreclosure of a lien upon said house. The defendants the building association and Noe filed separate answers. The case, as against them, was tried to the court without a jury. The court found in favor of the defendants.

The important question of fact in the case was as to the time of filing the notice of lien. Whether it were in time depended upon whether or not the last…