Legal Opinion

Whittaker v. Coombs

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided April 18, 1884PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Appeal from the City Court of East St. Louis; the Hon. William; P. Launtz, Judge, presiding.

1Opinion of the Court

Casey J.

This was an action on the case instituted hy appellee against appellant in the City Court of East St. Louis. The material averments in the declaration are: That appellee was in the employ of appellant and engaged to assist the servants of appellant in unloading cars and filling an ice house, as a common laborer and for no other purpose. That while so regarded the superintendent of appellant directed him to couple cars, which were being carelessly pushed together by other servants of appellant, well knowing that appellee was unskillful and unable to perforin such service without…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Chicago & Alton Railroad v. MayIllinois Supreme Court · 1883
  2. Camp Point Manufacturing Co. v. BallouIllinois Supreme Court · 1874
  3. Pennsylvania Co. v. LynchIllinois Supreme Court · 1878
  4. Laning v. New York Central RailroadNew York Court of Appeals · 1872
  5. Lalor v. Chicago, Burlington & Quincy RailroadIllinois Supreme Court · 1869

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Olsen v. Triangle Mining Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1917
  2. Star Elevator Co. v. CarlsonAppellate Court of Illinois · 1897

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API