Legal Opinion

Stover v. United States

District Court, N.D. California

Decided April 23, 1962No. Civ. 7483, 7486, 7506, 7545, 7635, 7664-7670, 7672, 7673, 7675-7677PublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HALBERT, District Judge.

In these actions for damages (amounting to some $13,000,000) resulting from the inundations of December, 1955, in the Marysville-Yuba City area, the United States has asserted several affirmative defenses (See: Huffmaster v. United States, D.C., 186 F.Supp. 120). 1 Jurisdiction is asserted under the Federal Tort Claims Act (Title 28 U.S.C. §§ 1346 and 2671 et seq.). The asserted causes of action are for negligence in the planning, design, construction, maintenance and operation of the levees and other works comprising the Sacramento River Flood Control Project, of…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. United States v. SponenbargerSupreme Court of the United States · 1939
  2. Solon B. Clark, Jr., and Geraldine A. Clark, Husband and Wife, and Related Cases v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1954
  3. Guy F. Atkinson Co. v. Merritt, Chapman, & Scott Corp.District Court, N.D. California · 1954
  4. Huffmaster v. United StatesDistrict Court, N.D. California · 1960
  5. Villarreal v. United StatesDistrict Court, S.D. Texas · 1959

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. Lunsford v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1977
  2. C. S. Lenoir v. Porters Creek Watershed DistrictCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1978
  3. Lunsford v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1977
  4. Raymond L. Stover v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1964
  5. Florida East Coast Railway Co. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1975

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API