City of Austin v. Foster
Court of Appeals of Texas
1Opinion of the Court
POWERS, Justice.
This is an appeal from the judgment in an eminent domain case wherein the trial court awarded compound prejudgment interest in addition to the net amount of the condemnation award.1 We reform the trial court’s judgment to allow prejudgment interest based upon simple interest only and affirm the judgment as reformed.
Appellant, the City of Austin, concedes that prejudgment interest was a proper award in this case, but contends the trial court erred in awarding compound rather than simple interest.2 Appellees, the property owners, contend that the court acted properly and…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Black Lake Pipe Line Co. v. Union Construction Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1976
- State v. HaleTexas Supreme Court · 1941
- Republic National Bank of Dallas v. Northwest National Bank of Fort WorthTexas Supreme Court · 1979
- Watkins v. JunkerTexas Supreme Court · 1897
- Smith v. National Resort Communities, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 1979
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- City of Houston v. Texan Land and Cattle Co., Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2004
- Whittington v. City of Austin, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)2005
- City of Houston v. WolfeCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1986
- State v. DoyleAlaska Supreme Court · 1987
- Texon Energy Corp. v. Dow Chemical Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1987
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.