Legal Opinion

Baldwin v. Pisacreta

Massachusetts Appeals Court

Decided April 12, 1977PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

This is an action in two counts by which the plaintiff seeks to recover damages for a personal injury sustained by him while working in the employ of the defendant on May 4, 1967. Both counts allege that the defendant was not a subscriber under the Workmen’s Compensation Act at the time of the injury complained of; count 1 alleges that the plaintiff was injured by reason of the defendant’s negligence; count 2 alleges that at the time of the injury the plaintiff was engaged in “hazardous employment” as determined by the Commissioner of Labor and Industries. See G. L. c. 152, §§ 1 (4) (c) (as…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Reidy v. Crompton & Knowles Loom WorksMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1945
  2. Berube v. HortonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1908
  3. Starr v. ChafitzMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1944
  4. Maciejewski v. Graton & Knight Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1947
  5. Paananen v. RhodesMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1972

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Rainka v. Kon ShingMassachusetts District Court, Appellate Division · 2000
  2. Rodriguez v. WinikerMassachusetts District Court, Appellate Division · 2004

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API