Legal Opinion
United States v. Pinkham
Court of Appeals for the First Circuit
Decided July 18, 2018No. 17-1664PPublishedCited by 27 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
SELYA, Circuit Judge.
Defendant-appellant Dale Pinkham, Sr., challenges his 240-month incarcerative sentence. He strives to convince us that the district court held him responsible for an incorrect drug quantity and, in the bargain, improperly counted two prior convictions when calculating his criminal history score. We are not persuaded by either argument and, therefore, summarily affirm his sentence.
I. BACKGROUND
Because this appeal follows the appellant's guilty plea, we draw the facts from the change-of-plea colloquy, the uncontested portions of the presentence investigation report (PSI…
2Cases cited41 opinions
- Gall v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Puckett v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- United States v. Ilario M.A. ZanninoCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1990
- Moskal v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
- Bifulco v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by27 opinions
- United States v. Rivera-MoralesCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2020
- United States v. Padilla-GalarzaCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2021
- United States v. GonzalezCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2020
- United States v. IlarrazaCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2020
- United States v. RabbCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2021
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.