Legal Opinion

Southern California Stroke Rehabilitation Associates, Inc. v. Nautilus, Inc.

District Court, S.D. California

Decided March 24, 2011No. 3:09-mj-00744PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER: (1) GRANTING DEFENDANT’S REQUEST FOR JUDICIAL NOTICE; (2) DENYING DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT; (3) GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT

JANIS L. SAMMARTINO, District Judge.

Presently before the Court are the parties’ cross motions for summary judgment. (Doc. Nos. 94, 100.) Also before the Court are Defendant’s request for judicial notice (Doc. No. 94-7(RJN)), and the parties’ respective oppositions and replies (Doc. Nos. 99 (Pl.’s Opp’n), 104 (Def.’s Opp’n), 103 (Def.’s Reply), 105 (Pl.’s Reply)). Having considered the parties’…

2Cases cited52 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. Taylor v. SturgellSupreme Court of the United States · 2008
  5. Semtek International Inc. v. Lockheed Martin Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 2001

47 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Lucore v. Bank of America, N.A.District Court, S.D. California · 2022
  2. Sommer v. General Motors CorporationDistrict Court, S.D. California · 2021
  3. Vahora v. Valley Diagnostic Laboratory Inc.District Court, E.D. California · 2020

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API