Legal Opinion

Hester v. Human

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided November 29, 1993No. A93A1000PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

McMurray, Presiding Judge.

This is a personal injury action arising from injuries plaintiff Hester received while using a dirt boring machine manufactured by defendant Charles Machine Works, Inc. d/b/a Ditch Witch. The machine was employing a tool known as a “back reamer” (used to pull cable through a hole bored under a roadbed) manufactured by defendant McLaughlin Manufacturing Company. Defendant Larry D. Human d/b/a Ditch Witch of Albany is a retailer of such equipment and provided the equipment plaintiff was using, as well as related instructional manuals, to plaintiff’s employer.

The…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Southeast Ceramics, Inc. v. KlemSupreme Court of Georgia · 1980
  2. Costanzo v. JonesCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1991
  3. Higdon v. Georgia Winn-Dixie, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1965
  4. Attwell v. Lane Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1987
  5. Smith v. Clarke Hardware Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1897

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Norman v. AultSupreme Court of Georgia · 2010
  2. Battersby v. BoyerCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1999
  3. Corbin v. Farmex, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1997
  4. Howard v. Technosystems Consolidated Corp.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 2000
  5. Waters v. Chase Manhattan BankCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2011

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API