Legal Opinion
Howard v. Technosystems Consolidated Corp.
Court of Appeals of Georgia
Decided June 30, 2000No. A00A0784PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Miller, Judge.
Lynnell F. Howard filed a pro se complaint alleging claims for negligence, breach of contract, fraud and deceit, and misrepresentation against Technosystems Consolidated Corporation, Intromark, Inc., and Invention Submission Corporation (“ISC”).1 To attempt to effectuate service against these nonresident corporations, Howard served the Secretary of State under OCGA § 14-2-1510 (b) and mailed the defendants copies of the , complaint and summons by “restricted delivery.” After Howard obtained an order declaring them in default, the defendants successfully petitioned to open that…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Tuggle v. HelmsCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1998
- Ellerbee v. Interstate Contract Carrier Corp.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1987
- Gantt v. BennettCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1998
- Clements v. United Equity CorporationCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1972
- Collins v. ByrdCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1992
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Young v. Oak Leaf Builders, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 2006
- Williams v. City of AtlantaCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2006
- TURFSTORE.COM, INC. v. HALL Et Al.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 2019
- BURGOS v. SAND CANYON CORPDistrict Court, M.D. Georgia · 2019
- MARK A. RICHARDS v. OPTEUM MORTGAGE D/B/A OPTEUM MORTGAGE ACCEPTANCE CORP.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 2022
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.