Legal Opinion

Security Pacific National Bank v. Agnew

California Court of Appeal

Decided August 23, 1988No. B028713PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

STONE (S. J.), P. J.

The subject of this appeal is the interpretation of a provision in a will disposing of the principal of a residuary trust. We conclude that the trial court’s interpretation of this provision is erroneous, and reverse.

Background

Anna Edwards (Anna) died in 1931; she left no spouse or children, and had three brothers.

In a will executed in 1930, she created a residuary trust which reads as follows in pertinent part: “Eighth: All the rest, residue, and remainder of *1370my property, real, personal, and mixed, and wheresoever the same may be situate [szc] or being, I give,…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Estate of DodgeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971
  2. Estate of NewmarkCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1977
  3. Maud v. CatherwoodCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1945
  4. Lombardi v. BloisCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1964
  5. Estate of StokleyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1980

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Estate of EdwardsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1988

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API