Security Pacific National Bank v. Agnew
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
STONE (S. J.), P. J.
The subject of this appeal is the interpretation of a provision in a will disposing of the principal of a residuary trust. We conclude that the trial court’s interpretation of this provision is erroneous, and reverse.
Background
Anna Edwards (Anna) died in 1931; she left no spouse or children, and had three brothers.
In a will executed in 1930, she created a residuary trust which reads as follows in pertinent part: “Eighth: All the rest, residue, and remainder of *1370my property, real, personal, and mixed, and wheresoever the same may be situate [szc] or being, I give,…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Estate of DodgeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971
- Estate of NewmarkCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1977
- Maud v. CatherwoodCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1945
- Lombardi v. BloisCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1964
- Estate of StokleyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1980
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Estate of EdwardsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1988