Legal Opinion

County of Merrimack v. Derry

Supreme Court of New Hampshire

Decided May 31, 1966No. 5427PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLampron, J.

There is no obligation at common law upon the State or any of the instrumentalities of government to furnish relief to the poor. Manchester v. Hillsborough, 100 N. H. 79, *21381; St. Johnsbury v. Granby, 124 Vt. 367, 369; 41 Am. Jur., Poor and Poor Laws, s. 35, p. 707. The whole matter is purely statutory and where the statute imposes no liability, there is none. Worcester v. Charlton, 336 Mass. 525. However “provision for relief and support at public expense of persons unable to support themselves has long been a part of our statutory law.” Wolfeboro v. Milton, 103 N. H. 174, 175. “The ultimate…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. City of Worcester v. Town of CharltonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1957
  2. Inhabitants of Embden v. Inhabitants of AugustaMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1815
  3. Inhabitants of Town of Amity v. INHABITANTS, ETC.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1957
  4. Town of St. Johnsbury v. Town of GranbySupreme Court of Vermont · 1964
  5. Inhabitants of Braintree v. Inhabitants of HinghamMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1821

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Moore v. GanimSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1995
  2. Moore v. GanimSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1995

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API