Legal Opinion

Roy v. McCormack Pacific Co.

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided December 27, 2000No. 97-00659; CA A105275PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtEdmonds, P. J.

In this workers’ compensation case, claimant seeks judicial review of an order of the Board, in which the Board upheld SAIF’s denial of compensation for claimant’s current condition and consequential injury. We reverse.

Claimant was injured twice. In August 1996, he suffered a torn meniscus in his left knee in a work-related accident (the August injury). The torn portion of the meniscus was surgically removed on October 1,1996. SAIF determined that claimant’s August injury and his resulting condition were compensable. It accepted a “left knee strain and contusion,” and “a grade 3 tear of the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Albany General Hospital v. GasperinoCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1992
  2. SAIF Corp. v. BeldenCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1998
  3. Oregon Lox Co. v. NicholsCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1997

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Hewlett-Packard Co. v. ToyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2001
  2. Roy v. McCormack Pacific Co.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2001
  3. SAIF Corp. v. KriseCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2004

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API