Legal Opinion

Roy v. McCormack Pacific Co.

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided February 28, 2001No. 97-00659; CA A105275PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtEdmonds, P. J.

SAIF petitions for reconsideration of our opinion in this workers’ compensation case, Roy v. McCormack Pacific Co., 171 Or App 526, 17 P3d 550 (2000). Claimant also cross-petitions for reconsideration. We allow reconsideration on both petitions, modify our opinion, and adhere to our previous disposition.

Claimant sought judicial review of an order of the Workers’ Compensation Board upholding SAIF’s denial of compensation for claimant’s current condition and consequential injury. SAIF had originally accepted claimant’s condition consisting of a left knee strain and contusion and a tear of the…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Roy v. McCormack Pacific Co.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2000
  2. Chaffee v. NoltCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1988

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. SAIF Corp. v. KriseCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2004

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API