Legal Opinion
Tyler v. O'NEILL
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Decided February 23, 1998No. Civil Action 97-3353PublishedCited by 19 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
JOYNER, District Judge.
This case has been brought before the Court upon motion of Defendants for dismissal of Plaintiffs second amended complaint. For the reasons which follow, the motion shall be granted in part and denied in part.
Factual Background
According to the allegations in plaintiffs complaint, defendant, Wm. M. Hendrickson, Inc. (“Hendrickson”) is a Pennsylvania corporation engaged in the business of repairing railway cars with its principal place of business in Philadelphia. In 1981, Defendant George O’Neill purchased 90% of the stock of Hendrickson and left his…
2Cases cited68 opinions
- Cohen v. Beneficial Industrial Loan Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1949
- Sedima, S. P. R. L. v. Imrex Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1985
- H. J. Inc. v. Northwestern Bell Telephone Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Kamen v. Kemper Financial Services, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Kehr Packages, Inc. v. Fidelcor, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1991
63 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- Official Committee of Unsecured Creditors Ex Rel. Estate of Lemington Home for the Aged v. Baldwin (In Re Lemington Home for the Aged).Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2015
- Weston v. Northampton Personal Care, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2013
- Accurso v. Infra-Red Services, Inc.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2014
- Marchese v. UmsteadDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2000
- Bair v. PurcellDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 2007
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.