Legal Opinion
People v. Conrail Corp.
Appellate Court of Illinois
Decided May 12, 1993No. 5-92-0539PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Lewis
This case involves an interlocutory appeal pursuant to Supreme Court Rule 307 (134 Ill. 2d R. 307) from orders denying motions to dissolve or vacate an ex parte temporary restraining order (TRO) and from the court’s subsequent entry of a preliminary injunction against the defendants on July 14, 1992. Only defendants TENNSV, Inc. (TENNSV), and Consolidated Rail Corporation (Conrail) appeal from the circuit court’s orders. The other defendant, C W I, Inc., does not join in this appeal. The issues on appeal are: (1) whether the trial court erred in issuing the ex parte TRO; (2) whether the trial…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Gibbons v. OgdenSupreme Court of the United States · 1824
- City of Philadelphia v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- H. P. Hood & Sons, Inc. v. Du MondSupreme Court of the United States · 1949
- Chicago & North Western Transportation Co. v. Kalo Brick & Tile Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Fort Gratiot Sanitary Landfill, Inc. v. Michigan Department of Natural ResourcesSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Harper v. Missouri Pacific RailroadAppellate Court of Illinois · 1994
- Fayus Enterprises v. BNSF Railway Co.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2010
- People v. Conrail Corp.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1993