Legal Opinion

Garbell v. Hardwoods

California Court of Appeal

Decided April 5, 2011No. B221482PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

ALDRICH, J.

The smoke from a fire at the Calabasas home of James and Rita Garbell damaged their personal property. For their personal property loss, the Garbells’ insurance company paid the policy limit of $424,050, which covered about half of their loss. The Garbells sued Conejo Hardwoods, Inc., to recover for their uninsured loss, and the Garbells’ insurer sued Conejo Hardwoods in a separate subrogation action to recover what it paid the *1566Garbells. Workers from Conejo Hardwoods (the workers)1 were installing hardwood flooring in the Garbells’ house on the day of the fire.

The jury…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Crawford v. Southern Pacific Co.California Supreme Court · 1935
  2. Helfend v. Southern California Rapid Transit DistrictCalifornia Supreme Court · 1970
  3. Goodman v. LozanoCalifornia Supreme Court · 2010
  4. Ortega v. Kmart Corp.California Supreme Court · 2001
  5. Viner v. SweetCalifornia Supreme Court · 2003

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Hernandez v. County of Los AngelesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2014
  2. County of Kern v. JadwinCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2011
  3. Webster v. Claremont Yoga, California Court of Appeal, 5th District2018
  4. Getsen Acquisitions v. Zapf CA4/1California Court of Appeal · 2014
  5. Hernandez v. JensenCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2021

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API