Garbell v. Hardwoods
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
ALDRICH, J.
The smoke from a fire at the Calabasas home of James and Rita Garbell damaged their personal property. For their personal property loss, the Garbells’ insurance company paid the policy limit of $424,050, which covered about half of their loss. The Garbells sued Conejo Hardwoods, Inc., to recover for their uninsured loss, and the Garbells’ insurer sued Conejo Hardwoods in a separate subrogation action to recover what it paid the *1566Garbells. Workers from Conejo Hardwoods (the workers)1 were installing hardwood flooring in the Garbells’ house on the day of the fire.
The jury…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Crawford v. Southern Pacific Co.California Supreme Court · 1935
- Helfend v. Southern California Rapid Transit DistrictCalifornia Supreme Court · 1970
- Goodman v. LozanoCalifornia Supreme Court · 2010
- Ortega v. Kmart Corp.California Supreme Court · 2001
- Viner v. SweetCalifornia Supreme Court · 2003
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Hernandez v. County of Los AngelesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2014
- County of Kern v. JadwinCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2011
- Webster v. Claremont Yoga, California Court of Appeal, 5th District2018
- Getsen Acquisitions v. Zapf CA4/1California Court of Appeal · 2014
- Hernandez v. JensenCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2021
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.