Glen Alden Corp. v. Tomchick
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Woodside, J.,
The defendant in this ease questions the jurisdiction of the court of common pleas over an action to recover alleged overpayments made to a widow under a workmen’s compensation agreement.
For the purpose of determining jurisdiction, all facts which are averred in the complaint must be accepted as true. Gardner v. Allegheny County, 382 Pa. 88, 94, 114 A. 2d 491 (1955).
The facts averred in the complaint are as follows:
The Glen Alden Coal Company, now Glen Alden Corporation, entered into a workmen’s compensation agreement providing for the payment to the defendant of the…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Gardner v. Allegheny CountySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1955
- Zupicick v. P. & R. C. & I. Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1932
- Kitchen v. Miller Bros. Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1934
- Zurich General Accident & Liability Insurance v. KleinSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1956
- Humbird v. DavisSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1904
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- 4934, Inc. v. District of Columbia Department of Employment ServicesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1992
- Fahringer, McCarty & Grey, Inc. v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
- Bigley v. Unity Auto Parts, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1981
- Fetterman v. GreenSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1997
- DeMontis v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1977
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.