Legal Opinion
Holland v. State
Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama
Decided September 30, 1994No. CR 91-1421PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ON RETURN TO REMAND
On original submission, this Court found that the petition for post-conviction relief had been timely filed and remanded this cause with instructions that the merits of the appellant's allegations of ineffective assistance of counsel be addressed.621 So.2d 373.
The record on return to remand consists of five volumes. After an evidentiary hearing, the circuit court, with commendable thoroughness, reviewed the merits of the appellant's allegations and concluded that neither trial nor appellate counsel was ineffective. We agree with the circuit court's findings of fact and…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Powell v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
- Michel v. LouisianaSupreme Court of the United States · 1956
- Affronti v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1955
- Ex Parte BaldwinSupreme Court of Alabama · 1984
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Reed v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 1997
- Lane v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1997
- P.D.F. v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1999
- Reed v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 1997