Legal Opinion

Schmidt v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided March 12, 1985No. 83-866PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Per curiam

This is an appeal conducted pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), in a probation revocation proceeding. After the public defender filed a memorandum brief, this court afforded Dieter Schmidt the opportunity to file additional briefs in this appeal. He has done so, the state filed a response and we now affirm as to all issues raised except the issue of the trial court’s retention of jurisdiction.

Appellant, pro se, raises several points on appeal, only one of which has merit. He asserts that he was not told, at the time he entered his plea of nolo…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Anders v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. State v. GreenSupreme Court of Florida · 1982
  3. Crawford v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1983
  4. Fowler v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1983
  5. Mrozowski v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1984

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. James Harmon, Iii, 080164 v. Tom L. Barton, Robert ButterworthCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1990

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API