State v. Hodgdon
Supreme Court of New Hampshire
1Opinion of the Court
BRODERICK, j.
After a jury trial in Superior Court (Smukler, J.), the defendant, Daniel Hodgdon, was convicted of two counts of aggravated felonious sexual assault, RSA 632-A:2 (1996) (amended 1997, 1998), and one count of felonious sexual assault, RSA 632-A:3 (1996) (amended 1997). On appeal, he argues that the trial court should have excluded the testimony of the victim’s pediatrician, and that the evidence was insufficient to support the convictions. We affirm.
I
The following evidence was adduced at trial. On February 9, 1996, the victim, then age six, and her brother, then age ten,…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- State v. ChickSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1996
- State v. MelcherSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1996
- State v. Zeta Chi FraternitySupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1997
- State v. HennesseySupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1997
- State v. LaRoseSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1985
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- State v. CobbSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1999
- State v. PelletierSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2003
- State v. GonzalezSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2003
- State v. DiNapoliSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2003
- State v. FullerSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2001
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.