Legal Opinion

(HC) Stephens v. Warden J. Schultz

District Court, E.D. California

Decided August 22, 2024No. 2:24-cv-02467Unknown

1Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA CIVIL MINUTES – GENERAL Case No. 2:24-cv-06327-DOC-AJR Date: August 22, 2024 Page 1 of 5 Title: Jimmie E. Stephens v. Warden J. Schultz et al., DOCKET ENTRY: ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY THIS ACTION SHOULD NOT BE TRANSFERRED TO THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA PURSUANT TO

28 U.S.C. § 1404

(A) OR DISMISSED FOR FAILURE TO STATE A COGNIZABLE HABEAS CLAIM PRESENT: HONORABLE A. JOEL RICHLIN, UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE _ Claudia Garcia-Marquez_ _______None_______ __None__ Deputy Clerk Court Reporter/Recorder Tape No. ATTORNEYS PRESENT FOR…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Estelle v. McGuireSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  2. Mullaney v. WilburSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  3. Greenholtz v. Inmates of the Nebraska Penal & Correctional ComplexSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  4. Braden v. 30th Judicial Circuit Court of KentuckySupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  5. Swarthout v. CookeSupreme Court of the United States · 2011

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API