Sixta v. State

OPINION

HUTSON-DUNN, Justice.

A jury found appellant, Daniel Sixta, guilty of driving while intoxicated. The trial court sentenced appellant to 20-days confinement and a $300 fine.

Appellant brings two points of error, asserting that the State failed to prove venue and that the judge who presided over the case was not statutorily qualified. We affirm.

In his first point of error, appellant argues that the trial court erred in denying his motion for instructed verdict because the State failed to prove venue. Officer Ramirez, the arresting officer, testified that the location of appellant’s arrest…