Legal Opinion

Marriage of Huber v. Huber

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided February 17, 1992No. 64A03-9105-CV-00124PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

STATON, Judge.

Daryl Huber appeals an interlocutory order concerning the disposition of a marital asset. He presents us with the sole issue of whether the trial court erred in determining that pension contributions made after March 19, 1960 are a marital asset.

We affirm.

Daryl! and Karen Huber were married on March 19, 1960; this marriage was dissolved on July 25, 1980. Following a short period of cohabitation, the Hubers remarried on December 13, 1980. The Hubers continued to live in the original marital residence and commingled all or a portion of the personal property divided in the…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. In Re the Marriage of AdamsIndiana Supreme Court · 1989
  2. Marriage of Lulay v. LulayIndiana Court of Appeals · 1991

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Marriage of Lulay v. LulayIndiana Court of Appeals · 1992
  2. Marriage of Ross v. RossIndiana Court of Appeals · 1994
  3. Smith v. SmithIndiana Court of Appeals · 1997
  4. Marriage of Hughes v. HughesIndiana Court of Appeals · 1992
  5. Armando B. Quintero v. Maria L. QuinteroIndiana Court of Appeals · 2013

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API