Legal Opinion

State v. Dabney

Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma

Decided September 15, 1943No. A-9973PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJones, P. J.

The defendant, O. B. Dahney, wad charged in the court of common pleas of Tulsa county, by information, with the crime of blacklisting. The information alleged that the defendant “did unlawfully, wilfully, maliciously and knowingly blacklist one Alize Gray in way and manner as follows : He, the said O. B. Dabney, then and there was the Business Manager of the Commercial Business College, located at 117 South Birmingham Avenue, in the city of Tulsa, Oklahoma, and that on the 2nd day of June, 1910, one Alize Gray entered said business college as an apprentice instructor in said institution and…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Kepner v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1904
  2. State v. BarnettCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1936
  3. Dick v. Northern Pacific Railway Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1915
  4. State ex rel. Scheffer v. JustusSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1902
  5. State v. YoungCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1922

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Loparex, LLC v. MPI Release Technologies, LLCIndiana Supreme Court · 2012
  2. King v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1954
  3. Powers v. OwenCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1966
  4. Glenn v. Diabetes Treatment Centers of America, Inc.District Court, S.D. Iowa · 2000
  5. Nichols v. Pray, Walker, Jackman, Williamson & MarlerCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 2006

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API