Commonwealth v. Holm
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Cercone, J.,
This appeal arises from the lower court’s sentencing the appellant, Peter Holm, to a term of six to twenty-three months, after a hearing at which Mr. Holm was found to have violated a condition of his probation. Appellant now contends that: (1) The court acted beyond its power in attaching conditions to appellant’s probation; (2) The court must find that appellant’s violation of a condition of his probation was willful; and that the evidence produced at the hearing was insufficient to establish a willful violation.
Peter Holm, although he has been domiciled in the United…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Griffin v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1956
- Williams v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Tate v. ShortSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Commonwealth v. KatesSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1973
- Commonwealth ex rel. Benedict v. CliffSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1973
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Commonwealth v. WaltonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1979
- Commonwealth v. CarverSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2007
- Commonwealth v. MallonSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1979
- State v. BuelowCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1984
- Commonwealth v. Del ConteSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1980
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.