Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Holm

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided March 31, 1975No. Appeal, No. 1329PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Cercone, J.,

This appeal arises from the lower court’s sentencing the appellant, Peter Holm, to a term of six to twenty-three months, after a hearing at which Mr. Holm was found to have violated a condition of his probation. Appellant now contends that: (1) The court acted beyond its power in attaching conditions to appellant’s probation; (2) The court must find that appellant’s violation of a condition of his probation was willful; and that the evidence produced at the hearing was insufficient to establish a willful violation.

Peter Holm, although he has been domiciled in the United…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Griffin v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1956
  2. Williams v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  3. Tate v. ShortSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  4. Commonwealth v. KatesSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1973
  5. Commonwealth ex rel. Benedict v. CliffSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1973

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. WaltonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1979
  2. Commonwealth v. CarverSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2007
  3. Commonwealth v. MallonSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1979
  4. State v. BuelowCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1984
  5. Commonwealth v. Del ConteSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1980

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API