Talcott v. Bennett
Nebraska Supreme Court
. Error from the district court of Douglas county. Tried below before Ferguson, J. References: Edgerton v. WacMer, 9 Neb., 500; Harper v. Pope, 9 Mo., 403; Harman v. Looker, 73 Mo., 622; Both v. Shipley, 1 Mo., 229; Scroggs v. Daugherty, 53 Mo., 497; Fike v. Clark, 55 Mo., 155; Thomas v. Black, 22 Mo., 330; Butler v. Lawson, 72 Mo., 227; Campbell v. Rowe, 32 Neb., 345. References as to what constitutes “absconding” or “concealment” within the purview of section 20 of the…
Read the full summary
. Error from the district court of Douglas county. Tried below before Ferguson, J. References: Edgerton v. WacMer, 9 Neb., 500; Harper v. Pope, 9 Mo., 403; Harman v. Looker, 73 Mo., 622; Both v. Shipley, 1 Mo., 229; Scroggs v. Daugherty, 53 Mo., 497; Fike v. Clark, 55 Mo., 155; Thomas v. Black, 22 Mo., 330; Butler v. Lawson, 72 Mo., 227; Campbell v. Rowe, 32 Neb., 345. References as to what constitutes “absconding” or “concealment” within the purview of section 20 of the Code, relating to limitation of actions: Hoggett v. Emerson, 8 Kan., 262; Frey v. Aultman, 30 Kan., 181; Myers v. Center,…
1Opinion of the Court
Ryan, C.
This action was begun in the district court of Douglas county for the recovery of judgment for the value of. certain goods sold by the plaintiff to the defendant in the state of New York in November of the year 1869. The question involved was whether or not the statute of limitations of this state had barred plaintiff’s alleged cause of action. On sufficient evidence the jury found specially that the defendant came to the state of Nebraska in December, 1878, and that on August 18,1891, the commencement of 'this action, he could, for an 'aggregate period of four years, have been served…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Hoggett v. EmersonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1871
- Frey v. Aultman, Miller & Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1883
- Myers v. CenterSupreme Court of Kansas · 1891
3Cited by2 opinions
- Dalition v. LangemeierNebraska Supreme Court · 1994
- Northern Commercial Co. v. Big Four Trading Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1915