Northern Commercial Co. v. Big Four Trading Co.
Washington Supreme Court
Appeal from a judgment of tbe superior court for King county, Tallman, J., entered January 31, 1914, upon findings in favor of the defendants, in an action on a promissory note, tried to the court.
1Opinion of the CourtMount, J.
This action was brought to recover upon a promissory note executed by the Big Four Trading Company at Council City, Alaska. The defense was the statute of limitations. The case was tried to the court without a jury. Findings were made to the effect that the action was barred, and an order of dismissal was entered. The plaintiff has appealed.
The facts are substantially as follows: From the year 1900 to the spring of 1902, Charles Lubbe, Edmund Thomasson, Peter T. Nelson, and E. G-. Lubbe, were doing business as a partnership at Council City, Alaska, under the name of Big Four Trading Company.…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Stubblefield v. McAuliffWashington Supreme Court · 1898
- Engel v. . FischerNew York Court of Appeals · 1886
- Perkins v. JenningsWashington Supreme Court · 1902
- Bassett v. ThrallWashington Supreme Court · 1899
- Frey v. Aultman, Miller & Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1883
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Bethel v. SturmerCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1970