Legal Opinion

In Re Washington State Apple Advertising Commission

District Court, E.D. Washington

Decided March 14, 2003No. CS-01-0278-EFSPublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER GRANTING INTERVENING DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR PRELIMINARY INJUNCTIVE RELIEF

SHEA, District Judge.

In 1937, the Washington apple industry envisioned the development and marketing of quality apples to the world. The Washington State legislature shared that vision and created the Washington Apple Advertising Commission, currently known as the Washington State Apple Commission (“the Commission”). 1 The enabling statute allowed the Commission to assess one cent on each box of apples packed for fresh market; today’s growers pay 25 cents per box. Those assessments pay for retail and export…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. New York Times Co. v. SullivanSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  2. Central Hudson Gas & Electric Corp. v. Public Service CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  3. Schneider v. State (Town of Irvington)Supreme Court of the United States · 1939
  4. Weinberger v. Romero-BarceloSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  5. Sable Communications of California, Inc. v. Federal Communications CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1989

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Cochran v. VenemanCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2004
  2. ANN VENEMAN, Secretary, U.S. Department of Agriculture,NATIONAL DAIRY PROMOTION BOARDCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2004
  3. ANN VENEMAN, Secretary, U.S. Department of Agriculture,NATIONAL DAIRY PROMOTION BOARDCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2004
  4. Ago, Washington Attorney General Reports2005

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API