Legal Opinion

McNac v. Jones

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided June 10, 1913No. 2654PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Error from District Court, Muskogee County; John H. King, Judge. Action by Mary -Coleman against Prince Coleman, a minor, Sam MeNac, Charles E. Bunyan, and others. From the-judgment, McNac and Kunyan bring error.

1Opinion of the CourtKane, J.

This was an action commenced by Mary Coleman against Prince Coleman, a minor, Dilsie Harris, of unsound mind, Lee Love, her guardian, Sam McNac, Charles E. Eunyan, Wiley Jones, and Martha Jones, for the purpose of partitioning a certain' tract of land situated in the Creek Nation. Upon trial the' court found that the plaintiff Mary Coleman was entitled to an undivided one-half interest to and in said land, and that Martha Jones was entitled to the remainder thereof, except a small portion, which was found to be the property of the minor, Prince Coleman. The defendants McNae and Runyan…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Mullen v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1912
  2. Rentie v. McCoySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1912
  3. Parkinson v. SkeltonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1912
  4. Deming Inv. Co. v. Bruner Oil Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1913
  5. Manuel v. Smith Et Vir.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1913

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Iowa Land & Trust Co. v. DawsonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1913
  2. Parks v. LoveSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1915

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API